首页> 外文OA文献 >Lighting control systems in individual offices at high latitude: measurements of electricity savings and users preferences
【2h】

Lighting control systems in individual offices at high latitude: measurements of electricity savings and users preferences

机译:高纬度各个办公室的照明控制系统:节电量和用户偏好的测量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract in Undetermined An efficient lighting control systems (LCS) should take advantage of the natural light available, but this presents some technical challenges as well as user related issues. So far, the assessment of lighting energy consumption of LCS has been based on technical features rather than the occupants’ acceptance. This article presents the results of a monitoring study providing some recommendations based on the human and technical aspects of LCS in small scale applications. Four identical peripheral office rooms located in Lund, Sweden, were equipped with four different LCS: manual switch at the door, presence detector, daylight dimming with absence detector and LED task lamp. Each occupant performed ordinary office tasks for two weeks in each room in April-May 2013. A subjective evaluation concerning the general lighting experience and the appreciation of the LCS was carried out. The results indicate that the manual switch was greatly appreciated and it accomplished good energy performances (75% savings compared to the presence detector). The daylight-linked LCS achieved only slightly higher savings (79%), due to relatively high parasitic losses, but did not guarantee an optimal light environment. The desk lamp achieved 97% savings, but the lighting conditions were considered unacceptable by the office workers. In general, the participants in this study perceived all automatic controls as stressful.
机译:不确定的摘要有效的照明控制系统(LCS)应该利用可用的自然光,但这带来了一些技术挑战以及与用户相关的问题。到目前为止,LCS照明能耗的评估是基于技术特征而不是居住者的认可。本文介绍了一项监视研究的结果,该研究基于LCS在小规模应用中的人员和技术方面提供了一些建议。位于瑞典隆德的四个相同的外围办公室房间配备了四个不同的LCS:门上的手动开关,存在探测器,带缺失探测器的日光调暗器和LED任务灯。 2013年4月至5月,每个占用者在每个房间中执行了两个星期的日常办公任务。对总体照明体验和LCS的欣赏度进行了主观评估。结果表明,手动开关倍受赞赏,并且实现了良好的能源性能(与存在检测器相比节省了75%)。由于相对较高的寄生损耗,与日光连接的LCS仅实现了稍高的节省(79%),但不能保证最佳的光照环境。台灯节省了97%,但办公室工作人员认为照明条件不可接受。一般而言,本研究的参与者认为所有自动控制都是有压力的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号